• This topic is empty.
Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11035 Reply

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    I should add to what Jeff said about his sad Coumadin patient story.

    In 15 years using a FRP Nd:YAG with at least 150usec pulse duration, I have never, ever taken a patient of Coumadin regardless of their INR.

    I have an arguement with an MD who was insistent on taking the patient off for 4 days, as we were cplanning on two quads of LANAP, and I had to be firm with him and tell him how this laser works, and my experience.

    To an MD that has little if any understanding of lasers, their idea is that laser just vaporize tissue.

    After I made my position CLEAR, he said, “Well it’s your risk, not mine.” When everything turned out just fine with the patient, I never heard a word from the MD.

    Typical…….With all the tremendous clinical outcomes like this and others (such as healing HSV-I in Chemo patients that don’t otherwise heal for weeks after chemo), I have only received one call from an MD, and that was from my Dad’s med school classmate Dr Robert Sweezy when I treated a weeping skin infection on one of his sons who is also a dental patient. Dr Sweezy was impressed enough to call, but a lifelong friend of my Dad. (Dr Sweezy of Sky Mall fame and his orthopeadic pillows).

    Bob

    #11028 Reply

    Hubert
    Spectator

    Glenn,

    wonderful case and documentation, thanks for sharing!
    Two Q’s:
    What Er/Yag tip diameter did you use?
    What is high mag in your case? Reason I ask is I have a Global G6 scope here to test-drive and I am trying to find my way around.

    Will you attend the Int. Relations Committee meeting in Tucson? if so, we will meet each other there. Looking forward to see you.
    Hubert

    #11026 Reply

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Hi there, I have not been around lately ( soo busy), but I always use the 400 micron Hoya Con Bio tip for the Delight/Versawave.

    There are 6 steps of mag onthe G6 and I break them up into 3 groups in my head.

    The settings are usually

    2.1 , 3.2 X mag (LOW MAG)
    5, 8X mag (medium mag)
    12,19X mag (high mag).

    Now in the beginning 8 years ago I couldnt get passed the 2.5 and 4 X mag on my global protege plus 6 step scope but I am now spending most time at 8-12X mag.

    Hubert, I will be there if I can remember when it is. Let me know if you get this.

    Glenn

    #11039 Reply

    csrose
    Spectator

    Wow!! Terrific photography!! I am a new periolase guy interested in soft tissue treatments. It is nice to see you erbium guys hard at work. I will try to document my cases as well as you have. Thanks for the inspiration
    Scott

    #11031 Reply

    Hubert
    Spectator

    Glenn,

    kinda late but still – thanks for the wonderful workshop in Tucson- now I have seen your set-up and caught a glimpse of how you work- a role model definitely! Actually I was so impressed that I will try to get a global scope and camera so I can eventually document my work better.
    Keep up the great work as a pacer for better dentistry!
    Hubert

    #11027 Reply

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Hi Hubert………it was awesome to meet new friends like yourself and Ken and the ALD and run into long term friends like Ron as well.

    I was honoured to receive the Leon Goldman award for 2006 for clinical excellence in the field of Laser dentistry and so it kinda of means that all my hard work to improve my clinical work was noticed by others and that is gratifying.

    I appreciate the comments Scott and Hubert, posting the photographs makes me a better dentist ( I learn from the constructive criticisms of others ) and in the end it educates people to the potential of lasers and scopes. Finally, its like a coffee table book that Kramer was putting together in Seinfeld.

    Its just an atlas of pictures to look at and say hmmmmmm……..thats interesting , maybe I could do that for Mr. or Mrs… so and so.

    If that one thing is my lasting legacy then I can rest in peace.

    Thanks to all for your continued friendship, support and kind words. It makes it all worth while.

    Glenn

    #11029 Reply

    Hubert
    Spectator

    Hi Glenn,

    wonderful case and documentation-as always. You seem to be the inspiring soul to the laser community- I too have employed your laser-assisted extraction procedure to the point where it is the standard now.

    I’d like to discuss the diode part a bit further. Do you use 810 or 980nm? Could you clinically find a difference between both with 980 having a higher absorption in water in regards to coagulation and cutting efficiency?
    Do you discern between starting off with a hot tip or a clean fiber?
    Seems like insomnia is also common between laser people, no?
    Take care
    H.

    #11021 Reply

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Hi Hubert: thanks man for the nice comments, it really is appreciated. I have been lax on posting cases and my goal in the next couple of months is to start posting more again.

    I have used both an 810 and a 980 clinically although at present I just use an 810 (Odyssey and Hoya Con Bio Diodent 1) in my practice. I wasnt sold that the water absorption and streaming water with high energy settings (ala Mike Swick) was quicker, less painful post op and the water hindered by ability to see the tissue laser interaction. Sure I got less charring when I used the water flow on the laser but I didnt see the benefit other than that AND I did seem to get more post op discomfort from the 980 group.

    I post for you below something that was posted on DT about the difference between the 810 and 980 written from the 810 bias. Its kinda how I feel about the whole situation.

    NOw having said that I think that the nice size of the Sirolaser is great but the glasses from all reports on not great (too dark and big). Size and weight wise the Sirolaser is great but keep an eye out for some of the other companies as there are things in the works with at least two companies that I know for producing some novel concepts. Cant say more but I know that there is stuff on the horizon.

    Cya

    Glenn

    Here is someone from Zap lasers Alex DiSessa

    DIODE LASERS – Clearing the air on the [not so new] wavelength confusion

    Over the last several months, there has been significant publicity and controversy surrounding the effectiveness of various wavelengths used for dental diode lasers. Although the wavelength concept has been made to sound [overly] complex, there are some simple principles contained herein that should clarify some of the common misconceptions.

    Background: Most diode lasers on the market today operate somewhere in the range between 800 and 980 nanometers (nm). There is really no mystique of using a soft tissue laser to remove or cut gum tissue, whether it be a diode from 800-980nm, or even an Nd:YAG which operates at 1064nm. The ultimate clinical objective of each of these devices is to boil the water content within the inter- and intracellular matrix of oral tissues. Once the intra- and intercellular temperature has been raised to 100-150° C, it is simply a matter of boiling or vaporizing the water within these tissues.

    800 – 810 nm: Many of today’s popular diode lasers today are set to operate in the wavelength range of 800 – 810nm. This wavelength range was selected because it has extremely favorable absorption of both hemoglobin and melanin (dark pigment), and diseased tissues have more hemoglobin and also pathogenic, pigmented bacteria which live within in the gingival tissues. By initiating the tip, which focuses the photons of light at the tip, thus creating both an end cutting as well as a side-cutting instrument, the 800 – 810nm diode laser raises temperature to boil the water. This has been described as a hot tip effect. However, by initiating the tip, less power output is required, and one can safely and effectively raise the intra- and intercellular water to 100-150° C without any charring. It should be noted that some of the perceived “charring” of the 800 – 810nm diodes is not charring at all, but rather it is the absorption by hemoglobin which upon contact, causes a dark brown/black appearance.

    980 nm: The 980nm wavelength is not new to the diode laser scene. In fact, models offering this wavelength have been readily available for many years. This wavelength range was selected because it has extremely favorable absorption of water. When originally introduced, tests were performed using a 980nm diode laser in order to differentiate the attributes of this wavelength from all other diode wavelengths. Such tests included cutting of gingival tissue under an external water stream with very high power output (10-15 Watts). The test results demonstrated that “radiant” energy (i.e., non-initiated tip) could effectively avoid charring given the distinctive attributes of water absorption with the 980nm wavelength. However, “non-charring” radiant energy results were conditional upon the use of high power output (i.e., at least 7 – 10 Watts) and external water irrigation.

    Comparisons: Although controversy still exists about “radiant energy” versus using an initiated tip, the maximum power output level for most 800 – 980 nm diode lasers on the market today is far below those used/required in those earlier tests. Additionally, hemoglobin absorption, and consequently, coagulation, is not as effective at the 980nm wavelength as compared to the 800 – 810nm wavelengths, even when cutting in a radiant fashion. Therefore, any perceived advantage of using radiant energy with a 980nm wavelength laser is negated by a lesser control of hemostasis.

    One additional factor recently adding to the wavelength controversy has been that of fiber size. It is correct that as the fiber size (diameter) decreases, the energy level emitted from the fiber is effectively increased. Unfortunately, it is also correct that as the fiber size decreases (i.e., below the 300µ range), it becomes more fragile, and thus more impractical and difficult to use for most soft tissue procedures.

    Conclusion: The soft tissue diode laser continues to increase in its use as an effective instrument for today’s dentist. Originally starting out as converted overpowered medical lasers with extremely high wattage, today’s soft tissue lasers are specifically designed for dentistry, operating at much lower and efficient power levels. The issue of diode laser wavelength has been a continuing debate, and models in the 980nm range have been available for many years, as have models in the 800 – 810nm range. As stated, the wavelengths have slightly different attributes, but generally all diode lasers in the 800 – 980nm range are designed to function with similar results. In recent years much of the emphasis has been to operate the laser unit at the lowest level of output possible that can effectively perform the function. Such lower output levels provide a safety range for both patient and clinicians, and extend the life of the diode array component.

    Alex Di Sessa
    Zap Lasers, LLC
    http://www.zaplasers.com
    888 876 4546


    Alex Di Sessa
    Zap Lasers, LLC
    888 876 4546
    http://www.zaplasers.com
    Innovations in Laser Science™

    #11034 Reply

    Kenneth Luk
    Spectator

    Hi Hubert and Glenn,
    I started with 980nm, now 810nm.
    I don’t find any difference between the two wavelengths when I use the same parameters with the 810. I still use Mick technique as I use a very high power.
    As I’m using a pretty high power diode with very short pulse, I’m achieving coagulation and haemostasis pretty quickly. Sometimes a bit too quick. If I observe surface dehydration/blackening(charring), I place a piece of wet gauze wiht finger pressure on the socket. This quickly cools down the area in case too much energy was delivered. .
    Ken

    #11032 Reply

    Hubert
    Spectator

    Glenn, Ken,

    this is a very informative text you sent- it sheds some more light on the issue. I own both 980 (Sirolaser) plus 810 (opus 5) and am not sure about the clinically relevant differences-yet. The 980 people stress that they always use uninitiated tips which they think gives them an edge over the competition because of the higher absorption in water-a statement that I do not consider completely accurate (words chosen carefully) because all diode users know when and how to use the “hot tip” to the pts advantage. Glenn and Ken, could you send me your private e-mail adress again.
    Thanks for sharing- and we thought diodes discussion had been beaten to death…

    #11033 Reply

    Kenneth Luk
    Spectator

    Hubert,
    If you want to see an un-initiated fiber in ablating soft tissue instantly with almost no contact , try the elexxion.
    You can get subsurface coagulation even with a 600um fiber at 2mm distance.
    you forgot my e-mail? pdent…….
    Ken

    #11030 Reply

    Hubert
    Spectator

    Ken,

    thanks. Can you tell me (us) what are the typical settings and procedures with your Elexxion and what the difference is to our lower power, CW diodes. Since I have the luxury of choice between Er, CO² and the diodes I may not have employed the diodes to their full scope. In case of soft tissue surgery I traditionally turn to CO² but I like the “laser curettage” with the diode and the initiated “side-firing” tip very much and the diode is very good at it.
    H.

    #11024 Reply

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Hey Hubert……my email address is glennvanas@shaw.ca

    Take care and great thread.

    Glenn

    #11040 Reply

    NouraHmadi
    Spectator

    Lasers are also used to remove decay within a tooth and prepare the surrounding enamel for receipt of the filling. Lasers are also used to “cure” or harden a filling.

Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)
Reply To: Lasers for extractions
Your information: